摘   要赠与合同作为我国《合同法》中所规定的合同之一,它的特征和性质和其他一般合同有很大的区别。赠与合同不像买卖合同一样是交易的主要方式,但它是社会生活中不可缺少的一环。赠与合同的撤销权向来为众多学者所争议,有人认为撤销权赋予了赠与人太大的权利,容易让赠与人任意而为,使得社会缺少信赖,也有人认为撤销权很好的平衡了双方的权利。

本文第一部分从赠与合同的基本概念入手,立足于赠与合同的撤销权与其特征和性质具有很大的关联性。在分析了国外与国内关于赠与合同性质之争的基础上,结合我国法学大家的观点,笔者归纳出自己的观点,认为赠与合同是诺成合同而非实践合同。89398

本文第二部分论述了赠与合同撤销权为什么能够存在以及存在的依据,我国赠与合同主要分为任意撤销权、法定撤销权、穷困抗辩权,笔者将此三种类型撤销权进行了对比,最后对最主要的争议点任意撤销权进行阐述。

第三部分笔者总结前文,归纳出我国法律关于赠与合同撤销权制度所存在的不足之处,任意撤销权存在着滥用的危险、受赠人的合理信赖利益缺少保护、法定撤销权中“严重侵害”标准并不明确。并结合全文,笔者提出了自己的拙见,认为该从何处入手来完善我国赠与合同撤销权制度,引入缔约责任过失、任意撤销权的主体应当包括受赠人、适当缩小任意撤销权的适用范围。

毕业论文关键词:赠与合同;诺成性;任意撤销权;信赖利益;

Abstract As one of the contract stipulated in the contract law of our country, the gift contract has a great difference between the gift contract and other general types of contracts。 Although the contract of gift can not be used as the main way of transaction, it is also an indispensable way of social life。 The right to revoke the gift contract has always been to many scholars controversy, some people think that the right to revoke the gift given too much power, to grant any person for the society, lack of trust, some people think that the right to revoke the good balance of the rights of the parties。

The first part of this paper starts with the basic concept of gift contract, which is based on the relationship between the right to revoke the contract and its characteristics and nature。 On the basis of the analysis of the dispute about the nature of the gift contract in China and abroad, the author sums up his own point of view with the view of the law of our country。 

    The second part discusses the gift of the right to revoke the why can exist and the existing on the basis of the contract, our donation contract is pided into arbitrary right of revocation, the statutory right of revocation, defense right, the author of this three types of right of revocation are compared, finally to any of the most controversial point of right of revocation。

The third part the author summarizes, summarized China's law on the right to revoke the gift contract system in place, there is the risk of abuse, arbitrary right of revocation of the recipient of the reasonable reliance interest protection, lack of legal right of cancellation in serious violation of the standard is not clear。 Combined with the text, the author puts forward his own opinion, that the start to improve our right system of gift contract where the main introduction of contracting fault liability, right of revocation shall include the donee a properly reduce the scope of right of revocation。

  Key words: gift contract; promissory nature; arbitrary right of revocation; reliance interest;

目录

1赠与合同概述 5

上一篇:试用期内劳动者权益保护研究
下一篇:没有了

论网络购物消费者权益的法律保护

浅论我国大赦制度及其当代重构

预期违约与不安抗辩 對合...

面向21世纪政治學研究的主题【8092字】

隐私权与知情权之探析【4399字】

重婚的法律认识与思考【6485字】

遗嘱继承法律制度修正完善之我见【6012字】

關于健康产业的创业项目...

下降星座查询测算,十二...

MATLAB教学课件设计

木霉T-soybean诱导杨树抗盐性分析

公职人员违法生育三胎如...

回归生活茬小學语文教學...

浅谈加密技术及其应用

论李碧华小说中人物命运的悲剧性

离婚的蛇男2022运势【字数650】

小學语文教學语言特点探索【1697字】