and R2 were 0.945, 0.863 and 0.841, respectively, and Bias was 0.32g/100g. The results of the UVE of the spectrum of the mulberry leaf powder MicroNIR1700 were the best.   The RMSEC and R2    of the calibration set were 0.58g/100g and 0.933, respectively, and the RMSECV and R2 were 0.82g/100g and 0.867, respectively. The RMSEP and R2        of he predicted set were 0.93g/100g and 0.864, respectively, and Bias was 0.02 g / 100g. UVE screening of fresh mulberry leaves and mulberry leaves crude protein DLP NIRScan Nano spectral wavelength of the best modeling effect, fresh mulberry leaf DLP NIRScan Nano spectral correction set RMSEC and R2    were 0.50g/100g and 0.950, cross validation RMSECV and R2 were 0.92g/100g and 0.831, respectively, and the RMSEP and R2 of the predicted set were 1.15g/100g and 0.804, Bias were -0.03g/100 g, the RMSEC, RMSECV of the mulberry leaf DLP NIRScan Nano spectrum RMSEP were 0.62g/100g, 0.93g/100g and 1.01g/100g, R2 , R2 and R2 were 0.923, 0.826 and 0.824, respectively, and Bias was 0.46g/100g.The results showed that the UVE screening results of the fresh mulberry leaf soluble protein MicroNIR1700 and DLP NIRScan Nano were the best. The RMSEC, RMSECV and RMSEP of the MicroNIR1700 spectrum were 1.72%, 2.38% and 2.39%,C , RCV    and RP     were 0.823, 0.670 and 0.742, respectively, and Bias was 1.36%.  The RMSEC, RMSECV and RMSEP of the DLP NIRScan Nano spectrum were 1.70%, 2.50% and 1.80%, R2 C,  R2 and R2 were 0.813, 0.608 and 0.821, respectively,  and Bias was 0.57%.

Randomfrog preferred mulberry leaf powder MicroNIR1700 spectral data modeling the best. The mean square error of calibration set, cross validation and prediction set were 1.41%, 2.34% and 2.14%, respectively, and the correlation coefficients were 0.849, 0.608 and 0.735 respectively, and Bias was -0.63%. The best results of the UVE of the DLP NIRScan Nano spectrum of the mulberry leaf   powder 

were the best. The RMSEC and R2 respectively. The RMSECV and R2 respectively.  The  RMSEP  and  R 2 of the calibration set were 1.14% and 0.921, of the cross validation were 2.13% and 0.732, of  the  prediction  set  were  2.58%  and  0.560 respectively, and Bias was -1.18%. The results show that the moisture content of mulberry leaves and the crude protein can be detected by the near infrared spectroscopy combined with wavelength optimization. At the same time, it is necessary to continue to study how to establish a prediction model for the detection of soluble sugar in mulberry leaves.

Key words: Mulberry leaf; Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy; Partial Least Square Method; Wavelength selection.

第一章绪 1

1.1引言 1

1.2桑叶品质评价的指标 2

1.2.1粗蛋白 2

1.2.2可溶性糖 2

1.2.3含水率 3

1.3近红外光谱分析技术 3

1.3.1近红外光谱简介及发展历程 3

1.3.2近红外光谱分析技术的理论基础 4

1.3.3近红外光谱分析技术的特点 4

1.3.4近红外光谱分析技术的基本流程 5

1.3.5近红外光谱分析技术的应用 5

1.4光谱数据处理及建模 6

1.4.1偏最小二乘法

上一篇:外源酶对桑叶红茶品质的影响
下一篇:家蚕丝素蛋白的光引发交联研究

基于激子-等离子体激元相...

基于微生物鉴定板使用的菌种分析研究

近红外光谱法建立桑品种快速检测模型

基于MODIS影像的洪泽湖水环...

基于Sentinel-2影像的洪泽湖...

基于SSR标记的观赏菊花遗传多样性分析

大盘山及邻近地区倒卵叶...

RGB-D相机视觉自主定位和空...

高校微博高校形象的宣传文献综述和参考文献

管理方式對农业院校研究...

城市休闲文化中的体验消费探究

南京红宝丽公司营运能力分析

液体浓度测量技术国内外研究现状

韩国电视真人秀节目《我...

请柬邀请函欢迎词欢送词...

近年来國内协商民主研究述评【8356字】

江苏省GDP预测研究