摘 要:非法证据排除规则是我国社会主义法治理念和保障人权理念在制度上的体现,为律师的有效辩护提供了有力支撑。但再好的规则制度也总有不完美的一面,它的适用效果在实践中并不乐观,这既有立法上的缺陷,即非法证据在认定上的模糊性以及相关制度的不完善;也有体制上的不足,各司法机关欠缺合理的权力配置及不能独立行使职权;还有各主体方面的原因,如非法证据排除程序的启动主体未纳入证人等其他人的原因,还有检察机关职能间的冲突和非法证据对法官自由心证的影响。这些都需要我们在实践中慢慢完善它,以便让其发挥更好的效果。34280 毕业论文关键词:非法证据排除规则;有效辩护;辩护权
Effective Defense Context About Illegal Evidence Exclusion rule
Abstract:The illegal evidence exclusion rule is the socialism rule of law idea and the safeguard human rights idea in the system, provides the powerful support for the lawyer's effective defense. But good rules and regulations are not perfect side, its applicable effect in practice is not optimistic, which is the legislative defects, namely illegal evidence in defining the fuzziness and the related system is not perfect; but also lack of the system, the judicial authorities lack the reasonable power allocation and not independent exercise of powers; and all the main aspects of the reasons, such as illegal evidence exclusion program startup subject not included in the witnesses, and other people, and the conflict between the functions of procuratorial organs and illegal evidence to the judge's discretional evaluation of evidence. Influence. All we need to improve it slowly in practice, in order to let it play a better effect.
Key words:Illegal evidence exclusion rule; Effective defense; The right to defend
目 录