高空抛物侵权责任研究
毕业论文关键词：高空抛物；侵权；过错推定
ABSTRACT In China's current tort liability law, high-altitude parabolic tort liability provisions are too vague and the practice for parabolic aerial liability investigated exists some problems ,we need put the theory into the practice and the parabolic aerial liability of the relevant provisions need to be studied, the corresponding system should be polished. Through the study of this subject, it should be clear that the tort liability of High altitude parabolic and the present implementation situation, we should point out the defects of the existing system regime, and according to the knowledge of related literature and our own points of view, learning the experience of our country and abroad, putting forward my own suggestions and improving them. In this paper, we part the five parts to propose this opinion. The first part: the implication meaning of the tort liability of High altitude parabolic.The second part: we mainly discuss the high-altitude parabolic tort imputation principle. The third part: it is pointed out that the deficiencies of the provisions of the current tort liability law. The fourth part: improving the measures of high-altitude parabolic causes on damaging relieves.
Keywords:High altitude parabolic;tort;presumption of fault
目 录
引言 1
第一章 高空抛物侵权行为的概述 2
1.1高空抛物侵权行为的概念 2
1.2 高空抛物侵权行为的特征2
1.3 高空抛物侵权行为与相关侵权行为的区别3
第二章 高空抛物侵权责任的归责原则6
2.1归责原则6
2.2因果关系推定6
第三章 《侵权责任法》关于高空抛物侵权责任的规定存在的问题.8
3.1混淆了不同性质的的法律责任8
3.2不符合侵权的构成要件8
3.3在司法实践中的不合理之处9
第四章 完善高空抛物致人损害救济的措施.10
4.1完善《侵权责任法》第87条的规定10
4.2保险救济.10
4.3物业管理公司的担责研究.11
结束语12
致谢.13
参考文献.14
引 言
随着建筑行业的快速发展，围绕着高层建筑，出现了许多高空抛物侵权案件。以“重庆烟灰缸案”为代表，此类案件引发了社会的深思，同时也产生了一系列的问题。在现行的《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》（以下简称《侵权责任法》）颁布实施之前，对高空抛物侵权案件缺乏系统而明确的规定，从而导致各个地方的法院在审理此类案件时出现了案件类型相同而审判结果却不同的现象。《侵权责任法》第87条的出台，有效地弥补了高空抛物侵权案件在理论以及实践中的空白，同时也为不同法院在审理此类案件时提供了法律依据。但是此条规定是否能够真正有效地维护受害人权益，彻底解决高空抛物侵权纠纷，众多学者对此存在不同的看法。鉴于此，笔者对该课题进行深入细致的研究。
上一篇：论商号权与商标权的冲突与解决