摘 要:本篇论文从什么是行政诉讼证明标准开始论述其中包含的有行政诉讼证明标准的特质,从四个主要方面入手:灵活性与延展性、中间性、复查性、特殊性,从而表现与民事诉讼证明标准、刑事诉讼证明标准的差别。我国的行政诉讼证明标准也存在这问题,比如证明标准过于单一,行政诉讼证明标准过于严格以及行政诉讼证明标准未反映行政诉讼特有的功能。英美法系国家行政诉讼证明标准与大陆法系国家行政诉讼证明标准的内容,在比较两者的利弊分析出对我国行政诉讼证明标准的启示。行政诉讼证明标准的研究对我国司法制度的完善有着显著的意义。文章主要分为四个部分:第一部分是行政诉讼证明标准的特质,考察行政诉讼证明标准的特征还有与民事诉讼、刑事诉讼证明标准的差异;第二部分是我国行政诉讼证明标准存在的问题;第三部分是外国行政诉讼证明标准的启示;第四部分是完善我国行政诉讼证明标准的思考。91905

毕业论文关键词:行政诉讼;证明标准;证据

STUDY ON CERTIFICATE STANDARD OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

Abstract: This paper begins with the question of what is the standard of administrative litigation, which includes the characteristics of administrative litigation proof standard, from four main aspects: flexibility and extension, intermediate, review, particularity, and performance and civil action Proof of standards, differences in the standard of proof of criminal proceedings。 China's administrative litigation certification standards also exist this problem, such as the proof of the standard is too single, the administrative litigation proved that the standard is too strict and the administrative litigation certification standards do not reflect the administrative litigation-specific functions。 The standard of administrative litigation of civil law system and the content of national administrative litigation proof standard in civil law system, and analyzes the pros and cons of the two laws and the enlightenment to the standard of administrative litigation in our country。 The study of the standard of administrative litigation proves that there is significant significance to the improvement of our judicial system。 The article is pided into four parts: the first part is the characteristics of the standard of administrative litigation, and the characteristics of the administrative litigation proof standard are different from the standard of civil litigation and criminal litigation。 The second part is the problem of the standard of administrative litigation The third part is the inspiration of the standard of foreign administrative litigation; the fourth part is the reflection of the standard of proof of administrative litigation in our country。

Keywords:adminstrative litigation; criterion of proof; evidence

目  录

一、引言 1

二、行政诉讼证明标准源G于J优L尔V论N文M网WwW.youeRw.com 原文+QQ75201`8766 的特质 1

三、我国行政诉讼证明标准存在的问题

(一)行政诉讼证明标准单一 3

(二)行政诉讼证明标准过于严格 3

(三)行政诉讼证明标准未反映出行政诉讼特有的功能 3

四、外国行政诉讼证明标准的启示 4

(一)英美法系国家的行政诉讼证明标准 4

(二)大陆法系国家的行政诉讼证明标准 5

五、完善我国行政诉讼证明标准的思考

上一篇:以买卖合同担保民间借贷合同的法律性质及效力分析
下一篇:没有了

论行政诉讼变更判决制度

浅论我国大赦制度及其当代重构

浅论预期违约【3605字】

浅论道路交通事故的民事...

浅论缔约過失责任与违约...

浅论环境权宪法的立法缺陷【4247字】

浅论物权法定原则【2572字】

苏童《黄雀记》中宿命观下的人性演绎

AT89S52单片机的空气监控系统设计+电路图+程序

OpenGL面向机器人遥操作的...

高校大學生网络安全现状...

日本猫文化热的产物介绍和原因分析

功能对等理论指导下的产品说明书的翻译

广州高校考研培训机构市场营销调查问卷

我想创业但湜没钱,我想...

Android平台下电话区号查询系统的实现

城市建设进程中协调拆迁开题报告