Rate-based calculations for trayed and packed columns offer process engineers a more rigorous and reliable basis for assessing column performance than the tradi- tional equilibrium-stage approach, especially for multicomponent separations。 Although the mathematics, thermodynamics, and transport-related physics upon which nonequili- brium separations theory is founded are generally true, it is also true that rate-based simulations today suffer from a serious weakness—they are ultimately tied to underlying equipment performance correlations with questionable predictive capability。 In the case of packed columns operated countercurrently, correlations are required for the mass- transfer coefficients, kx and ky, for the specific area participating in mass transfer, am, for the two-phase pressure drop, (Dp/Z)2/, and for the flood capacity of the column。 In particular, it is generally well known that packing mass-transfer correlations available in the public domain are unreliable when they are applied to chemical systems and col- umn operating conditions outside of those used to develop the correlations in the first place。 For that reason, we undertake the development of dependable, dimensionally con- sistent, correlating expressions for the mass-transfer-related quantities kx, ky, and am for metal Pall rings, metal IMTP, sheet metal structured packings of the MELLAPAK type, and metal gauze structured packings in the X configuration, using a new data fitting pro- cedure。 We demonstrate the superior performance of these correlations for a wide range of chemical systems and column operating conditions, including distillations as well as acid gas capture with amines。 Further, we show that these new correlations lead to pre- dictions for the relative interfacial area participating in mass transfer that can be greatly in excess of the geometrical surface area of the packing itself。 VVC 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 58: 132–152, 2012 71922
Keywords: mass-transfer coefficients, mass-transfer area, packed column, HETP, rate- based simulation
Introduction Recently, the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, in conjunction with the US Department of Energy, published Vision 2020: 2000 Separations Roadmap。1 This document outlines technical barriers and research needs for the foresee-
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to B。 Hanley at brian。hanley@aspentech。com。
VVC 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers
able future in the areas of adsorption, extraction, crystalliza- tion, membranes, bioseparations, and distillation。 Prominent among the most important research needs and barriers for distillation are as follows: (1) the need for a better under- standing of mass transfer and multiphase flow in both trayed and packed columns, (2) the lack of accurate real-stage effi- ciency models for these types of columns, and (3) the fact that nonequilibrium column models lack accuracy, general- ity, and ease of use。 In this article, we attempt to address some of the issues raised in the Vision 2020 report
132 January 2012 Vol。 58, No。 1 AIChE Journal
Table 1。 Experimental Results from Kister8 and Schultes9
System Pressure (torr) Packing HETP (Billet)5 HETP (BF82)4 HETP (Onda)3 HETP (Aspen) HETP (Expt)
C6/n-C7 760