Brown & Levinson (1987) put forward Politeness Theory based on Goffman’s theory of face。 They propose the theory that politeness strategies are chosen according to the degree of face threats。

Brown & Levinson summarize the politeness strategies as the following:

Do the FTA: (1) on record; without regressive action, badly; with regressive action positive politeness negative politeness (2) off record。 Don’t do the FTA。 (Brown & Levinson,1987; 60)

According to Brown & Levinson’s opinion, in business communication the Hearer and the Speaker want to build and maintain a friendly and comfortable business atmosphere, and the Speaker will try his best to satisfy the Hearer’s interest, wants, and needs, or on the other hand the Hearer wants the Speaker’s notice and approval (Brown & Levinson, 1987 :103)。

Brown & Levinson believe that “face is the public self-image that every member wants to claim for himself。” “Face is something that is emotionally invested, and that can be lost, maintained, or enriched, and must be constantly attended to in interaction”(Brown & Levinson, 1987:61)。 They believe that people save face in mutual cooperation 。文献综述

Brown & Levinson also make a distinction between positive and negative face and believe they are interrelated。 Positive face refers to an inpidual’s desire for approval, which means one hopes to get other people’s approval, love, appreciation and respect; negative face refers to an inpidual’s desire for autonomy, which means one does not want to be interrupted by other people but has his own freedom of choice (Brown & Levinson, 1987 : 62)。 In order to achieve face, people tend to apply appropriate strategic actions。 This politeness strategy includes bold on record, positive politeness, negative politeness, off record, non-performance。

Brown & Levinson also propose Face Threatening Acts which pose a threat to the self-image of the other party in the process of communication。 Face threatening acts can be found both in positive and negative face。 Speech acts posing a threat to a listener’s positive face mean that speaker pays little attention to the listener’s feelings, needs, and interest, which include objection, criticism, scorn, ridicule, complaint, insult and etc。 Speech acts which pose a threat to a listener’s negative face mean that speaker asks listener to do something and makes him feel under pressure。 These kinds of speech acts include order, request, suggestion, remind, threatening, warning and etc。

 Brown & Levinson believe that their face and politeness theory is a universal theory which applies to any culture。 Yet this needs to be proven。 In cross-cultural business communication, it can not be denied that confrontation and cooperation both exist side by side。 Brown & Levinson’s theory can be used to explain which speech acts threaten face, to which extent and what strategies should be taken as response。

上一篇:论动物隐喻在中西文化中的差异
下一篇:论《一个人的朝圣》有关爱的失去与回归

目的论视角下《哈利·波特...

生态翻译学视角下戏剧《...

从《红楼梦》两译本中反...

从萨特的存在主义视角浅析《名利场》

从女性主义视角解读《洛丽塔》

目的论视角下美国情景喜...

目的论视角下的外宣翻译...

阿格妮丝•赫勒的哲学思...

棕榈壳活性炭灰分的研究

建筑主体变形趋势预测【705字】

加强民主与法治,推进反腐倡廉工作【2128字】

企业内部沟通实践對内部...

萍乡市生育保险报销政策...

基于OpenCV的路标识别系统设计

化学教师教育专业学生教...

2D-3D视频转换技术研究

医学图像纹理特征提取任务书