摘  要：证据是证明案件事实的材料，是法官在司法裁判中认定过去发生事实存在的重要依据，所以，它是整个诉讼的核心。而证明标准是法官在诉讼中认定案件事实所达到的证明程度，它是整个证据体系中的关键与灵魂。行政诉讼证明标准的相关规定在我国成文法体现出来的只有《行政诉讼法》第69条、70条及89条。这几条规定都太过抽象简单，在现代司法实践中很难掌握和运用，容易滋生法官的腐败，比如办理人情案等。94343

    笔者通过对行政诉讼证明标准的基本概念的诠释，从行政诉讼证明标准的内涵、考量要素及我国行政诉讼证明标准的法律依据作出介绍。针对我国现行行政诉讼实务中存在的问题作出探讨，拟吸收其他国家的经验，试图提出完善建议。

毕业论文关键词：行政诉讼；证明标准；证据；完善

Research on the standard of Proof during the Administrative Proceedings of China

Abstract:Evidence is the material to prove the facts of the case, also is the important basis for the judge to identify facts that happened in the past in the judgment。 So, it is the core of the whole litigation。 While the standard of proof is the judge in the lawsuit to what extent they could prove to determine the case facts。 It is the key and soul of the whole evidence system。 The related rules of administrative proceedings standard of proof in China’s written law are embodied only in article 69, article 70 and article 89 in Administrative Procedure Law。 However all of the articles are over general and simple, which are not easy to handle and apply in juridical practices。 It is also easy for leading to corruption of judges, such as handing cases by personal relations。

    The thesis makes the basic overview of the administrative proceedings the standard of proof。 It gives introduction on the connotation, the elements to consider, and the legal basis of the standard of proof in the administrative proceedings。 It makes study on these problems and intends to draw on the experience of other countries。 It tries to put forward suggestions for improvement in China’s current administrative litigation practice。 

Key Words: administrative litigation; the standard of proof; evidence; perfect

目  录

一、 行政诉讼证明标准的基本概论 1

（一）行政诉讼证明标准的内涵 1

1。行政诉讼证明标准的概念 1

2。 行政诉讼证明标准的特点 1

3。 行政诉讼证明标准的作用 2

二、国外行政诉讼证明标准的适用 3

（一）英美法系国家的行政诉讼证明标准 3

1。实质性证明标准 3

2。专横、任性、滥用自由裁量权标准 4

3。重新审理标准 4

（二）大陆法系国家的行政诉讼证明标准 4

三、我国行政诉讼证明标准存在的问题 5

（一）行政诉讼证明标准过于单一 5

（二） 行政诉讼证明标准过高 5

（三） 行政诉讼证明标准未反映出行政诉讼的特有功能 6

四、 完善我国行政诉讼证明标准的建议